Export limit exceeded: 377282 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10530 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-66004 | 1 Libimobiledevice | 1 Libusbmuxd | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| A Path Traversal vulnerability in usbmuxd allows local users to escalate to the service user.This issue affects usbmuxd: before 3ded00c9985a5108cfc7591a309f9a23d57a8cba. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62593 | 1 Ray Project | 1 Ray | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Ray is an AI compute engine. Prior to version 2.52.0, developers working with Ray as a development tool can be exploited via a critical RCE vulnerability exploitable via Firefox and Safari. This vulnerability is due to an insufficient guard against browser-based attacks, as the current defense uses the User-Agent header starting with the string "Mozilla" as a defense mechanism. This defense is insufficient as the fetch specification allows the User-Agent header to be modified. Combined with a DNS rebinding attack against the browser, and this vulnerability is exploitable against a developer running Ray who inadvertently visits a malicious website, or is served a malicious advertisement (malvertising). This issue has been patched in version 2.52.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62362 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| gpp-burgerportaal is a Dutch government citizen portal application. In versions before 2.0.3, 3.0.2, and 4.0.1, the name and email address of employees who publish content are exposed in network responses and can be discovered by viewing the browser's developer tools network tab. This information disclosure may violate employee privacy expectations and could be used for targeted attacks or unwanted contact. This issue has been patched in versions 2.0.3, 3.0.2, and 4.0.1. No known workarounds exist. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62346 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Glovius Cloud | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60208 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tusko Trush Advanced Custom Fields : CPT Options Pages acf-cpt-options-pages allows Object Injection.This issue affects Advanced Custom Fields : CPT Options Pages: from n/a through <= 2.0.9. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60168 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in integrationshotelrunner HotelRunner Booking Widget hotelrunner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects HotelRunner Booking Widget: from n/a through <= 1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15550 | 1 Birkir | 1 Prime | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60075 | 2 Allegro Marketing, Wordpress | 2 Hpb Seo Plugin For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress hpbseo allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects hpb seo plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6001 | 1 Virtuemart | 1 Virtuemart | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the product image upload function of VirtueMart that bypasses the CSRF protection token. An attacker is able to craft a special CSRF request which will allow unrestricted file upload into the VirtueMart media manager. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59901 | 1 Flexense | 2 Disk Pulse Enterprise, Sync Breeze Enterprise Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5988 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) origin checking is not done on requests from the gateway to external components, such as the controller, hub, and eda. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59845 | 1 Apollographql | 2 Apollo Explorer, Apollo Sandbox | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58272 | 2 Ntt-east, Ntt-west | 2 Web Caster, Web Caster | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Web Caster V130 versions 1.08 and earlier. If a logged-in user views a malicious page created by an attacker, the settings of the product may be unintentionally changed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26816 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Intrexx Portal Server 12.0.2 and earlier which was classified as problematic potentially allows users with particular permissions under certain conditions to see potentially sensitive data from a different user context. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27080 | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the command line interface of AOS-CX could allow an authenticated remote attacker to expose sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to services outside of the impacted switch, potentially leading to lateral movement involving those services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14904 | 2 Anilankola, Wordpress | 2 Newsletter Email Subscribe, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Newsletter Email Subscribe plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4. This is due to incorrect nonce validation on the nels_settings_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56311 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In Shenzhen C-Data Technology Co. FD602GW-DX-R410 (firmware v2.2.14), the web management interface contains an authenticated CSRF vulnerability on the reboot endpoint (/boaform/admin/formReboot). An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, causes the router to reboot without explicit user consent. This lack of CSRF protection on a sensitive administrative function can lead to denial of service by disrupting network availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5598 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Path Traversal vulnerability in WF Steuerungstechnik GmbH airleader MASTER allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects airleader MASTER: 3.0046. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55758 | 2 Jdownloads, Joomla | 3 Jdownloads, Joomla, Joomla! | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Multiple CSRF attack vectors in JDownloads component 1.0.0-4.0.47 for Joomla were discovered. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54390 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the ResetPasswordRequest operation of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) when the zimbraFeatureResetPasswordStatus attribute is enabled. An attacker can exploit this by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a malicious webpage that silently sends a crafted SOAP request to reset the user's password. The vulnerability stems from a lack of CSRF token validation on the endpoint, allowing password resets without the user's consent. | ||||