| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| AI_ONLY_REPORT
package: iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.11-0.git4b3e853.el10
------
Summary: Stack Buffer Overflow in idbm_recinfo_config via Malicious iSCSI
Target: a crafted SendTargets TargetName can inject an extra configuration
line into a persisted node record and later cause a stack buffer overflow
when that record is reparsed.
Requirements to exploit: An attacker must control an iSCSI target or tamper
with SendTargets discovery traffic, return a crafted `TargetName`
containing a newline and oversized injected key or value data, have the
victim run persistent discovery, and then trigger a later node-record read
such as update or login.
Component affected: `iscsi-initiator-utils`;
`usr/idbm.c:idbm_recinfo_config`, with attacker-controlled input reaching
it through SendTargets handling in `usr/discovery.c` and later record
serialization in `usr/idbm.c`.
Version affected: `iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.11-0.git4b3e853.el10`
Patch available: no released package fix established; proposed patch
included below
Version fixed: unknown
Upstream coordination: Not notified.
CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - 7.5 (HIGH)
AV:N - The attacker can supply the malicious data over the network in a
SendTargets discovery response.
AC:L - The target-name length cap still leaves enough room for a newline
plus an overlong injected key; no race or unusual memory state is required.
PR:N - No prior access to the initiator is required.
UI:R - The victim must run SendTargets discovery that persists records
and later read the saved record.
S:U - The impact remains within the initiator-side component that parses
and stores its own database records.
C:L - Memory corruption could expose limited process memory, but
confidentiality impact is not demonstrated.
I:L - Process memory corruption can affect integrity, but reliable code
execution is not established.
A:H - The clearest supported outcome is a crash during config parsing.
Impact: Moderate. This issue could otherwise resemble an Important remote
denial-of-service flaw, but Red Hat rates such issues lower when they are
less easily exploited or depend on narrower conditions. Here, exploitation
requires a multi-step SendTargets discovery workflow, persistence of the
discovered record, and a later reread of that record. The strongest
supported outcome is denial of service or other memory corruption, while
code execution remains unproven.
Embargo: no
Reason: The available evidence supports a multi-step,
configuration-dependent denial-of-service or memory-corruption issue rather
than a demonstrated remote code execution flaw, so embargoed handling does
not appear necessary.
Acknowledgement: Aisle Research
Vulnerability Details: `idbm_recinfo_config()` copies config keys and
values into fixed stack buffers without bounds checks:
```c
while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') {
*(name+i) = *nl; i+; nl+;
}
...
while (*nl) {
*(value+i) = *nl; i+; nl+;
}
```
In this code path, `name` and `value` are 128-byte and 256-byte stack
buffers, so an injected key longer than 128 bytes or a value longer than
256 bytes can corrupt stack memory.
During SendTargets discovery, attacker-controlled `TargetName` text is
copied into the node record and later written back to disk without
control-character filtering:
```c
strlcpy(rec->name, targetname, TARGET_NAME_MAXLEN);
...
if (strlen(info[i].value))
fprintf(f, "%s = %s\n", info[i].name, info[i].value);
```
`process_sendtargets_response()` treats `TargetName=` records as discovery
input, and `add_target_record()` accepts names up to `TARGET_NAME_MAXLEN`.
That limit is 255 bytes in this package, which is still enough to carry a
newline plus a key longer than the 128-byte `name` buffer. A `TargetName`
such as `iqn.test\nAAAA...=B` can therefore split the serialized
`node.name` entry into two lines and inject a second config line.
Persistent SendTargets discovery stores discovered node records unless
nonpersistent mode is used, and later discovery update/login or explicit
node operations reread those saved records. The 2048-byte line buffer in
`idbm_recinfo_config()` does not prevent this because the injected line
only needs to exceed 128 bytes for the key or 256 bytes for the value.
Based on the available evidence, the supported impact is a crash or other
memory corruption during reparsing. Reliable code execution is plausible
but not established.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Run a malicious SendTargets responder, or intercept discovery traffic,
and return a `TargetName` value containing a newline and an oversized
injected key, for example `TargetName=iqn.test\nAAAAAAAA...(>=129 chars)=B`.
2. Run SendTargets discovery in its normal persistent mode. The default
`iscsiadm -m discovery ...` workflow persists records unless nonpersistent
mode is selected.
3. Inspect the saved node record and confirm that it contains both the
expected `node.name = ...` line and an injected `AAAA...=B` line.
4. Trigger any operation that rereads the node record, such as discovery
update, node update, or login.
5. Observe a crash during parsing. With instrumentation enabled, the
overflow should be reported in `idbm_recinfo_config()`.
Mitigation: Until a fix is available, avoid persistent SendTargets
discovery against untrusted or interceptable networks. Where operationally
acceptable, use nonpersistent discovery, and remove node records created
from untrusted discovery results before later update or login operations.
Proposed Fix: The fix should address both parts of the chain: bound the key
and value copies in `idbm_recinfo_config()` and reject control characters
in `TargetName` before persistence.
```diff
diff --git a/usr/idbm.c b/usr/idbm.c
@@ void idbm_recinfo_config(recinfo_t *info, FILE *f)
while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') {
*(name+i) = *nl; i+; nl+;
}
+ while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') {
+ if (i >= NAME_MAXVAL - 1) {
+ log_warning("Config file line %d key too long",
line_number);
+ break;
+ }
+ name[i++] = *nl++;
+ }
@@
while (*nl) {
*(value+i) = *nl; i+; nl+;
}
+ while (*nl) {
+ if (i >= VALUE_MAXVAL - 1) {
+ log_warning("Config file line %d value too long",
line_number);
+ break;
+ }
+ value[i++] = *nl++;
+ }
diff --git a/usr/discovery.c b/usr/discovery.c
@@ static int add_target_record(char *name, char *end, discovery_rec_t
*drec,
while ((nul < end) && (*nul != '\0'))
nul++;
+ for (char *p = name; p < nul; p++) {
+ if (*p == '\n' || *p == '\r' || (unsigned char)*p < 0x20) {
+ log_error("TargetName contains control characters,
rejecting");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
```
------
This report was generated using AI technology. Always review AI-generated
content prior to use |
| Grav API plugin versions before 1.0.13 fail to enforce API key scope caps in ConfigController super-scope gates, allowing scoped keys to write scheduler configuration. Attackers with a scoped api.config.write key can inject arbitrary commands into scheduler.custom_jobs that execute via Symfony Process for remote code execution. |
| Grav CMS before 2.0.13 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability in email-action parameters that allows low-privileged page editors to execute arbitrary operating-system commands. Attackers can inject Twig payloads using the unsandboxed find filter in email subject, body, to, or from fields to achieve remote code execution when forms are submitted. |
| The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.13 contains an API key scope-cap bypass in PagesController::guardTwigContent(). The Twig-toggle check uses a bare isSuperAdmin() gate that does not consult api_key_scopes, so a least-privilege API key scoped only to api.pages.write and minted on a super account can enable process.twig on a page save even though admin.pages_twig is intentionally outside the api.pages scope. When security.twig_content.process_enabled=true and editor_enabled=false, this allows Twig-in-content to execute server-side, resulting in server-side template injection (SSTI) and remote code execution. |
| Grav CMS before 2.0.13 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the Flex Objects plugin settings validation that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by uploading a ZIP file containing PHP code. Attackers can bypass routine name validation by using array notation instead of string notation, call the unZip routine with a malicious archive, and write PHP files to the web root for execution. |
| WebErpMesv2 is a Resource Management and Manufacturing execution system Web for industry. Versions 1.19 and prior allow any self-registered user to upload arbitrary PHP files through the HR Expense scan_file parameter, leading to Remote Code Execution. Combined with open registration (no invite required) and broken role middleware (CheckUserRole silently swallows RouteNotFoundException), this chain is effectively unauthenticated RCE against any default installation. The issue is patched in commit 5c54862fa044b363fd2be03d586750e81afd6818. |
| AgenticSeek (commit fc242c7) contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows any network-adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary commands by submitting crafted queries to the unprotected POST /query API endpoint bound to 0.0.0.0:7777 with wildcard CORS. Attackers can send unauthenticated HTTP requests that cause the autonomous agent to generate and execute shell commands through BashInterpreter using subprocess.Popen with shell=True and safety=False, bypassing the incomplete command blocklist to achieve full host-level code execution. |
| Contiki-NG's MQTT client parse_publish_vhdr() in os/net/app-layer/mqtt/mqtt.c sets topic_len_received=1 before checking topic_len against the 64-byte limit, so an over-length topic returns early but leaves the flag set. On the next TCP segment, tcp_input() re-invokes the parser with topic_received==0, and the persisted topic_len_received==1 skips the length-reading block containing the guard, falling through directly to a memcpy() that uses the unvalidated 16-bit topic_len as the copy length. The 65-byte topic[] destination overruns into adjacent struct fields including the payload_chunk pointer, which subsequent MQTT code dereferences, giving a compromised or attacker-controlled broker an arbitrary-pointer-write primitive. Contiki-NG's MQTT implementation has no TLS support so the connection is plaintext. Impact ranges from information disclosure and denial of service to remote code execution on embedded targets without memory protection. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation as the result of a remote code execution vulnerability in the activation engine component. An authenticated attacker can execute a maliciously planted script with root authority. |
| Streambert is a cross-platform Electron Desktop App to stream and download video content. Versions prior to 2.5.0 contain an unvalidated auto-updater URL vulnerability that allows a compromised renderer process to make the main process download and execute an arbitrary binary, resulting in remote code execution. Version 2.5.0 contains a patch. |
| Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in QA Analytics <= 5.2.0.0 versions. |
| DB-GPT v0.8.1 contains an unauthenticated path traversal vulnerability that allows remote attackers to write arbitrary files to any location on the server by injecting directory traversal sequences into the user_id HTTP header of the Python file-upload endpoint. Attackers can send a crafted multipart upload request with a traversal-poisoned user_id header to escape the intended upload directory and write attacker-controlled content to locations such as Python startup hooks, cron directories, or agent scripts, resulting in remote code execution. |
| The GeoDirectory – WP Business Directory Plugin and Classified Listings Directory plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the delete_revision function in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.169. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). By placing post_type=attachment exclusively in the query string to bypass the consistency check, an attacker can convert an auto-draft GeoDirectory listing into a WordPress attachment with attacker-controlled file paths injected into attachment metadata, which the delete_revision handler then dereferences and unlinks without any post-type or path validation. |
| Fooocus is an image generating software. In versions 2.5.5 and prior, the Fooocus web UI is vulnerable to remote code execution due to the unsafe use of eval when processing metadata JSON. An attacker with access to the Fooocus web UI may be able to execute arbitrary code on the instance. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available, but a suggested fix pull request is available. |
| FileRun up to and including version 2026.2.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution by uploading a file with a malicious filename containing shell command substitution sequences. The thumbnail generation system passes filenames wrapped in shell double-quotes directly to exec() without escapeshellarg() sanitization, allowing filenames such as $(PAYLOAD).mp4 to survive the filename sanitizer and be evaluated as shell commands when ffmpeg, ImageMagick, vips, or stl-thumb processes the file during thumbnail generation. |
| Autel Maxi Charger Single firmware through V1.03.51 allows unauthenticated remote code execution via the service listening on TCP port 9002. A crafted request to the /test endpoint can cause the device to download, extract, and execute attacker-controlled files with root privileges. |
| A flaw was found in acm-search-v2-rhel9. An attacker with administrative privileges on the hub cluster, specifically with patch access to the Search Custom Resource (CR), could exploit a vulnerability in the `Collector.ImageOverride` field. This allows the attacker to deploy an arbitrary container image across all managed clusters. The consequence is remote code execution (RCE), enabling the attacker to execute commands and potentially access sensitive information across the entire fleet of managed clusters. |
| UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions 4.4.1 through 5.3.5 are vulnerable to a missing-authentication / privilege-escalation chain in `pb.HandlerInitSuperuser` (`backend/pb/handlers.go:249`), reachable as `POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser`. The vulnerable code lacks any authentication, setup token, IP allow-list, or rate limit and is gated only by a `totalSuperusers > 0` count check — a condition that is false on every fresh install — allowing an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker to register the initial superuser account, receive a long-lived JWT, and pivot to root remote code execution at `backend/networking/wake.go:43` (`exec.CommandContext(ctx, "/bin/sh", "-c", wake_cmd)`). Version 5.4.0 fixes the issue. |
| GitPython versions before 3.1.54 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the check_unsafe_options guard that can be bypassed by smuggling git options inside single-character kwarg values. Attackers can supply crafted option dictionaries to clone_from, fetch, pull, push, ls_remote, iter_commits, blame, or archive methods to execute arbitrary OS commands via the --upload-pack parameter. |
