| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on KMC Controls BAC-5051E devices with firmware before E0.2.0.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that disclose the contents of a configuration file. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Resource Data Management (RDM) Intuitive 650 TDB Controller devices before 2.1.24 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on I-O DATA DEVICE ETX-R devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on I-O DATA DEVICE HVL-A2.0, HVL-A3.0, HVL-A4.0, HVL-AT1.0S, HVL-AT2.0, HVL-AT3.0, HVL-AT4.0, HVL-AT2.0A, HVL-AT3.0A, and HVL-AT4.0A devices with firmware before 2.04 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete content. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on Crestron Electronics DM-TXRX-100-STR devices with firmware through 1.3039.00040 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Bagisto before v.1.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML script. |
| CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests. |
| A vulnerability was found in mingyuefusu 明月复苏 tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 up to d4836f6b49cd0ac79a4021b15ce99ff7229d4694 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack, which could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient protections for the web UI of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user, such as deleting users from the device. |
| Broken Access Control vulnerability in Nickolas Bossinas WordPress File Upload allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WordPress File Upload: from n/a through 4.24.7. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Software Installer for Windows before 6.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-1971. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cherokee-admin in Cherokee before 1.2.99 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences, as demonstrated by a crafted nickname field to vserver/apply. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rapid7 Nexpose Security Console before 5.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that delete scan data and sites via a request to data/site/delete. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/profile/index.php in Moodle through 2.2.11, 2.3.x before 2.3.11, 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) categories or (2) fields. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Post Revolution 0.8.0c-2 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to (1) ajax-weblog-guardar.php, (2) verpost.php, (3) comments.php, or (4) perfil.php. |
| JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified administrative modules in Proofpoint Messaging Security Gateway 6.2.0.263:6.2.0.237 and earlier in Proofpoint Protection Server 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 6.0.2, 6.1.1, and 6.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in php/partie_administrateur/administration.php in WebJaxe 1.02 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify passwords or (2) add new projects. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.0 through 3.8.9 and 4.0.0rc through 4.0.0rc7, when the CustomFieldValuesSources (aka external custom field) option is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. |
