Export limit exceeded: 16161 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 10530 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10530 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-9730 | 1 Ibm | 2 Qradar Incident Forensics, Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM QRadar Incident Forensics 7.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1999549. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9975 | 1 Ibm | 2 Dashboard Application Services Hub, Jazz For Service Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Jazz for Service Management 1.1.2.1 and 1.1.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1998714. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9991 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Selling And Fulfillment Foundation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sterling Order Management 9.2 through 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 121314. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0045 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Windows DVD Maker in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows Vista SP2 does not properly parse crafted .msdvd files, which allows attackers to obtain information to compromise a target system, aka "Windows DVD Maker Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-0902 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| RubyGems version 2.6.12 and earlier is vulnerable to a DNS hijacking vulnerability that allows a MITM attacker to force the RubyGems client to download and install gems from a server that the attacker controls. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000008 | 1 Chyrp-lite Project | 1 Chyrp Lite | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Chyrp Lite version 2016.04 is vulnerable to a CSRF in the user settings function allowing attackers to hijack the authentication of logged in users to modify account information, including their password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000069 | 1 Oauth2 Proxy Project | 1 Oauth2 Proxy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF in Bitly oauth2_proxy 2.1 during authentication flow | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000093 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Poll Scm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Poll SCM Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to initiate polling of projects with a known name. While Jenkins in general does not consider polling to be a protection-worthy action as it's similar to cache invalidation, the plugin specifically adds a permission to be able to use this functionality, and this issue undermines that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000147 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Mahara 1.9 before 1.9.8 and 1.10 before 1.10.6 and 15.04 before 15.04.3 are vulnerable to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on the uploader contained in Mahara's filebrowser widget. This could allow an attacker to trick a Mahara user into unknowingly uploading malicious files into their Mahara account. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000224 | 1 Embedplus | 1 Youtube | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF in YouTube (WordPress plugin) could allow unauthenticated attacker to change any setting within the plugin | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000244 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Favorite | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Jenkins Favorite Plugin version 2.2.0 and older is vulnerable to CSRF resulting in data modification | ||||
| CVE-2017-1218 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123858. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12271 | 1 Cisco | 4 Spa300 Firmware, Spa300 Series Ip Phone, Spa500 Firmware and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in Cisco SPA300 and SPA500 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz88421, CSCuz91356, CSCve56308. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12303 | 1 Cisco | 1 Asyncos | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) file filtering feature of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured AMP file filtering rule. The file types affected are zipped or archived file types. The vulnerability is due to incorrect and different file hash values when AMP scans the file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email file attachment through the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured AMP file filter. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf52943. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12439 | 1 Socusoft | 1 Flash Slideshow Maker | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| SocuSoft Flash Slideshow Maker Professional through v5.20, when the advanced configuration is used, has an xml_path HTTP parameter that trusts user-supplied input, in conjunction with an unsafe XML configuration file. This has resultant content forgery, cross site scripting, and unvalidated redirection issues. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12584 | 1 Slims | 1 Senayan Library Management System | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| There is no CSRF mitigation in SLiMS 8 Akasia through 8.3.1. Also, an entire user profile (including the password) can be updated without sending the current password. This allows remote attackers to trick a user into changing to an attacker-controlled password, a complete account takeover, via the passwd1 and passwd2 fields in an admin/modules/system/app_user.php changecurrent=true operation. | ||||