| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Landing Page Builder – Coming Soon page, Maintenance Mode, Lead Page, WordPress Landing Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ulpb_admin_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, update, retitle, or change the post status, slug, and type of arbitrary posts and write ULPB_DATA post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This attack requires the victim to hold an editor-level or administrator session, as the wp_ajax_ulpb_admin_data action enforces a capability check that the forged request must satisfy by inheriting the logged-in user's session cookies. |
| Missing support for integrity check vulnerability in ABB KNX Update Tool (ABB), ABB KNX Update Tool (BJE).
This issue affects KNX Update Tool (ABB): through 2.0.175; KNX Update Tool (BJE): through 2.0.175. |
| Joomla Extension - joomdonation.com - User enumeration in Events Booking < 5.8.0 - The Joomla extension Events Booking prior version 5.8.0 had an frontend file upload endpoint that lacked CSRF protection. |
| The W3SC Elementor to Zoho CRM plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the storeInfo function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's Zoho CRM integration settings, replacing the configured data center, client ID, client secret, and user email credentials with attacker-controlled values via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| dataCycle is a data management system for centrally storing, managing, searching, finding, and distributing data. In dataCycle-CORE, the module handling core processing and framework rules, before and including version 25.07.3, the application exposes server-side state changes through `GET` routes. Because browsers automatically send cookies on same-site top-level navigation and Rails does not apply CSRF protections to `GET`, an attacker can force a logged-in victim to modify application state by embedding a link, image, iframe, or redirect to one of these endpoints. This was confirmed on the target with a normal `Standard` account: a cross-site-style `GET` to `watch_lists/:id/add_item?thing_id=...` inserted content into a watch list with no CSRF token. Additional `GET` mutation routes exist in the codebase, including user impersonation for authorized admins and cache or
translation state changes. This is patched in version 26.06.08. |
| djangoSIGE through 1.10 (commit a6fe7e8) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to cancel sales or purchase orders on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting order-cancellation logic implemented inside HTTP GET method handlers in CancelarOrcamentoVendaView, CancelarPedidoVendaView, CancelarOrcamentoCompraView, and CancelarPedidoCompraView. Attackers can lure an authenticated victim with change_orcamentovenda or equivalent permissions to a page containing a cross-origin reference such as an img tag pointing to the cancellation endpoint, bypassing CSRF token validation entirely since Django's CsrfViewMiddleware only enforces CSRF checks on unsafe HTTP methods. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ApusListing <= 1.2.63 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GiveWP <= 4.16.3 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avada Core <= 5.15.6 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in افزونه حمل و نقل ووکامرس (پست پیشتاز و سفارشی، پیک موتوری) <= 4.4.5 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Kwayy HTML Sitemap <= 4.0 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Popup for CF7 with Sweet Alert <= 1.6.5 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailPoet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This issue affects MailPoet: from 5.30.0 through 5.33.0. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Zarinpal Gateway <= 5.1.0 versions. |
| Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag.
This enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write.
All TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected.
We recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6 |
| A weakness has been identified in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. Affected is an unknown function of the component OAuth Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check
An unintended behavior in the TCP conntrack state machine allows a
connection to be forced into the CLOSE state using an RST packet with an
invalid sequence number.
Specifically, after a SYN packet is observed, an RST with an invalid SEQ
can transition the conntrack entry to TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE, regardless of
whether the RST corresponds to the expected reply direction. The relevant
code path assumes the RST is a response to an outgoing SYN, but does not
validate packet direction or ensure that a matching SYN was actually sent
in the opposite direction.
As a result, a crafted packet sequence consisting of a SYN followed by an
invalid-sequence RST can prematurely terminate an active NAT entry. This
makes connection teardown easier than intended.
So, tighten the state transition logic to ensure that RST-triggered
CLOSE transitions only occur when the RST is a valid response to a
previously observed SYN in the correct direction. |
| Issue summary: When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42)
peer key, the peer key is not properly checked for the subgroup membership.
Impact summary: A malicious peer which presents an X9.42 key carrying the
victim's p and g parameters, a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the
cofactor (p−1)/q_local), and a public value Y of order r can recover the
victim's private key after a small number of key exchange attempts.
When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the
subgroup membership check Y^q ≡ 1 (mod p) is performed using the peer's
own q parameter, not the local key's q. The peer's domain parameters are
then matched against the domain parameters of the private key, but the value
of q is not compared.
A malicious peer who presents an X9.42 key carrying the victim's p, g,
a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the cofactor), and a public
value Y of order r passes all checks. The shared secret then takes only
r distinct values, leaking priv mod r. Repeating for each small-prime
factor of the cofactor and combining via CRT recovers the full private
key (Lim–Lee / small-subgroup-confinement attack).
The realistic attack surface is narrow: principally CMP deployments with
long-lived RA/CA DHX keys and bespoke enterprise or government applications
using X9.42 DHX static keys with interactive protocols and therefore this
issue was assigned Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.1.2 and 3.0 are affected by this
issue. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommupt: Check for missing PAGE_SIZE in the pgsize_bitmap
Sashiko pointed out that the driver could drop PAGE_SIZE from the
pgsize_bitmap. That is technically allowed but nothing does it, and
such an iommu_domain would not be used with the DMA API today.
Still, it is against the design and it is trivial to fix up. Lift
the PT_WARN_ON to the if branch and just skip the fast path. |
| A vulnerability was determined in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is an unknown function of the file web/backend/api/auth.go. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 4b0229351678f479429b8d8b19207757266f246b. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue. |
