| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Use after free in Views in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Use after free in HTML in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Use after free in Aura in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| A flaw was found in the GStreamer gst-plugins-good package. The rtph264depay and rtph265depay RTP depayloader elements do not enforce a maximum size limit on the reassembly buffer used during fragmented RTP packet processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a continuous stream of RTP fragments without ever transmitting an end-of-fragment marker, causing the reassembly buffer to grow without bound until process memory is exhausted. This results in a denial of service through process termination. |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Not failing securely ('failing open') in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| Improper input validation in Power BI allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Backup Engine allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows GDI+ allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows DNS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Telephony Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Use after free in Windows Telephony Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere in Visual Studio Code - Python extension allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. |
| A flaw was found in Feast. An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the /materialize and /materialize-incremental endpoints. By sending a specially crafted request that omits the feature_views field, an attacker can bypass intended permission checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker, or any authenticated user, to trigger a full re-materialization of all feature views. The consequence is a Denial of Service (DoS) due to data corruption and significant resource consumption across all tenants. |
| Velociraptor allows multi-tenant deployments named "Orgs".
By default Velociraptor, uses the ROOT org, but users can create child orgs for other tenants within the same deployment.
Users can have different permissions in each org. To manage Orgs, Velociraptor usually examines the ORG_ADMIN permission on the ROOT org.
This issue results from the Velociraptor server allowing for the deletion of Orgs by incorrectly checking the ORG_ADMIN permission of callers within the calling ORG instead of the ROOT org. However, Org admins of child orgs were able to add this permission to their ACL token within their own org. This allows an administrator in a child org, which is not also an administrator in the ROOT org, to delete other orgs. |
