Export limit exceeded: 27207 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (27207 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-20056 | 1 Intel | 1 Vtune Profiler | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| Improper input validation for some Intel VTune Profiler before version 2025.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data manipulation. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20067 | 1 Intel | 3 Csme, Intel R Csme, Sps | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium |
| Observable timing discrepancy in firmware for some Intel(R) CSME and Intel(R) SPS may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10083 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could cause denial of service of engineering workstation when specific driver interface is invoked locally by an authenticated user with crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20290 | 1 Cisco | 8 Nexus, Nexus 3000, Nexus 9000 and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the logging feature of Cisco NX-OS Software for Cisco Nexus 3000 Series Switches, Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches in standalone NX-OS mode, Cisco UCS 6400 Fabric Interconnects, Cisco UCS 6500 Series Fabric Interconnects, and Cisco UCS 9108 100G Fabric Interconnects could allow an authenticated, local attacker access to sensitive information. This vulnerability is due to improper logging of sensitive information. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing log files on the file system where they are stored. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access sensitive information, such as stored credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20345 | 1 Duo | 1 Authentication Proxy | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the debug logging function of Cisco Duo Authentication Proxy could allow an authenticated, high-privileged, remote attacker to view sensitive information in a system log file. This vulnerability is due to insufficient masking of sensitive information before it is written to system log files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing logs on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information that should be restricted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20611 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20377 | 1 Cisco | 2 Unified Contact Center Express, Unified Intelligence Center | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the API subsystem of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of requests to certain API endpoints. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a valid request to a specific API endpoint within the affected system. A successful exploit could allow a low-privileged user to view sensitive information on the affected system that should be restricted. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20624 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21086 | 2 Intel, Linux | 2 Ethernet 700 Series Software, Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in the Linux kernel-mode driver for some Intel(R) 700 Series Ethernet before version 2.28.5 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24506 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A specific authentication strategy allows to learn ids of PAM users associated with certain authentication types. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47080 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| matrix-js-sdk is the Matrix Client-Server SDK for JavaScript and TypeScript. In matrix-js-sdk versions versions 9.11.0 through 34.7.0, the method `MatrixClient.sendSharedHistoryKeys` is vulnerable to interception by malicious homeservers. The method was introduced by MSC3061) and is commonly used to share historical message keys with newly invited users, granting them access to past messages in the room. However, it unconditionally sends these "shared" keys to all of the invited user's devices, regardless of whether the user's cryptographic identity is verified or whether the user's devices are signed by that identity. This allows the attacker to potentially inject its own devices to receive sensitive historical keys without proper security checks. Note that this only affects clients running the SDK with the legacy crypto stack. Clients using the new Rust cryptography stack (i.e. those that call `MatrixClient.initRustCrypto()` instead of `MatrixClient.initCrypto()`) are unaffected by this vulnerability, because `MatrixClient.sendSharedHistoryKeys()` raises an exception in such environments. The vulnerability was fixed in matrix-js-sdk 34.8.0 by removing the vulnerable functionality. As a workaround, remove use of affected functionality from clients. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47057 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| SummaryThis advisory addresses a security vulnerability in Mautic related to the "Forget your password" functionality. This vulnerability could be exploited by unauthenticated users to enumerate valid usernames. User Enumeration via Timing Attack: A user enumeration vulnerability exists in the "Forget your password" functionality. Differences in response times for existing and non-existing users, combined with a lack of request limiting, allow an attacker to determine the existence of usernames through a timing-based attack. MitigationPlease update to a version that addresses this timing vulnerability, where password reset responses are normalized to respond at the same time regardless of user existence. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10846 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| The compose-go library component in versions v2.10-v2.4.0 allows an authorized user who sends malicious YAML payloads to cause the compose-go to consume excessive amount of Memory and CPU cycles while parsing YAML, such as used by Docker Compose from versions v2.27.0 to v2.29.7 included | ||||
| CVE-2024-11084 | 1 Perforce | 1 Helix Alm | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Helix ALM prior to 2025.1 returns distinct error responses during authentication, allowing an attacker to determine whether a username exists. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24484 | 2 Intel, Linux | 2 Ethernet 800 Series Software, Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Improper input validation in the Linux kernel-mode driver for some Intel(R) 800 Series Ethernet before version 1.17.2 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24486 | 2 Intel, Linux | 2 Ethernet 700 Series Software, Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Improper input validation in the Linux kernel-mode driver for some Intel(R) 700 Series Ethernet before version 2.28.5 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24499 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE WAB762-1 (6GK5762-1AJ00-6AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (ME) (6GK5763-1AL00-7DC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-7DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUB762-1 (6GK5762-1AJ00-1AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUB762-1 iFeatures (6GK5762-1AJ00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-3AB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-3DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (USA) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0). Affected devices do not properly validate input while loading the configuration files. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24501 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An improper input validation allows an unauthenticated attacker to alter PAM logs by sending a specially crafted HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24504 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An improper input validation the CSRF filter results in unsanitized user input written to the application logs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24510 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in MS/TP Point Pickup Module (All versions). Affected devices improperly handle specific incoming BACnet MSTP messages. This could allow an attacker residing in the same BACnet network to send a specially crafted MSTP message that results in a denial of service condition of the targeted device. A power cycle is required to restore the device's normal operation. | ||||