Export limit exceeded: 377282 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (377282 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-42602 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| This vulnerability exists in Meon KYC solutions due to improper handling of access and refresh tokens in certain API endpoints of authentication process. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and manipulating the responses through API request body leading to unauthorized access of other user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42603 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| This vulnerability exists in the Meon KYC solutions due to transmission of sensitive data in plain text within the response payloads of certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting API response that contains unencrypted sensitive information belonging to other users. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow remote attacker to impersonate the target user and gain unauthorized access to the user account. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42604 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| This vulnerability exists in Meon KYC solutions due to debug mode is enabled in certain API endpoints. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing certain unauthorized API endpoints leading to detailed error messages as response leading to disclosure of system related information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42605 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| This vulnerability exists in Meon Bidding Solutions due to improper authorization controls on certain API endpoints for the initiation, modification, or cancellation operations. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter in the API request body to gain unauthorized access to other user accounts. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow remote attacker to perform authorized manipulation of data associated with other user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4261 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in GAIR-NLP factool up to 3f3914bc090b644be044b7e0005113c135d8b20f. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function run_single of the file factool/factool/math/tool.py. The manipulation leads to code injection. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42615 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In affected versions, vulnerability-lookup did not track or limit failed One-Time Password (OTP) attempts during Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) verification. An attacker who already knew or guessed a valid username and password could submit an arbitrary number of OTP codes without causing the account to be locked or generating any specific alert for administrators. This lack of rate-limiting and lockout on OTP failures significantly lowers the cost of online brute-force attacks against 2FA codes and increases the risk of successful account takeover, especially if OTP entropy is reduced (e.g. short numeric codes, user reuse, or predictable tokens). Additionally, administrators had no direct visibility into accounts experiencing repeated 2FA failures, making targeted attacks harder to detect and investigate. The patch introduces a persistent failed_otp_attempts counter on user accounts, locks the user after 5 invalid OTP submissions, resets the counter on successful verification, and surfaces failed 2FA attempts in the admin user list. This enforces an account lockout policy for OTP brute-force attempts and improves monitoring capabilities for suspicious 2FA activity.This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42616 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data, configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks: an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their authenticated session. Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent or awareness. The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42620 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In affected versions, vulnerability-lookup handled user-controlled content in comments and bundles in an unsafe way, which could lead to stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). On the backend, the related_vulnerabilities field of bundles accepted arbitrary strings without format validation or proper sanitization. On the frontend, comment and bundle descriptions were converted from Markdown to HTML and then injected directly into the DOM using string templates and innerHTML. This combination allowed an attacker who could create or edit comments or bundles to store crafted HTML/JavaScript payloads which would later be rendered and executed in the browser of any user visiting the affected profile page (user.html). This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42701 | 2 Crowdstrike, Microsoft | 2 Falcon, Windows | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium |
| A race condition exists in the Falcon sensor for Windows that could allow an attacker, with the prior ability to execute code on a host, to delete arbitrary files. CrowdStrike released a security fix for this issue in Falcon sensor for Windows versions 7.24 and above and all Long Term Visibility (LTV) sensors. There is no indication of exploitation of these issues in the wild. Our threat hunting and intelligence team are actively monitoring for exploitation and we maintain visibility into any such attempts. The Falcon sensor for Mac, the Falcon sensor for Linux and the Falcon sensor for Legacy Systems are not impacted by this. CrowdStrike was made aware of this issue through our HackerOne bug bounty program. It was discovered by Cong Cheng and responsibly disclosed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42706 | 2 Crowdstrike, Microsoft | 2 Falcon, Windows | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A logic error exists in the Falcon sensor for Windows that could allow an attacker, with the prior ability to execute code on a host, to delete arbitrary files. CrowdStrike released a security fix for this issue in Falcon sensor for Windows versions 7.24 and above and all Long Term Visibility (LTV) sensors. There is no indication of exploitation of these issues in the wild. Our threat hunting and intelligence teams are actively monitoring for exploitation and we maintain visibility into any such attempts. The Falcon sensor for Mac, the Falcon sensor for Linux and the Falcon sensor for Legacy Systems are not impacted by this. CrowdStrike was made aware of this issue through our HackerOne bug bounty program. It was discovered by Cong Cheng and responsibly disclosed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4272 | 2026-04-15 | 7 High | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Mechrevo Control Console 1.0.2.70. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality in the library C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\UniwillService\MyControlCenter\csCAPI.dll of the component GCUService. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled search path. An attack has to be approached locally. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4275 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the digital signature verification process does not properly validate variable attributes which allows an attacker to bypass signature verification by creating a non-authenticated NVRAM variable. An attacker may to execute arbitrary signed UEFI code and bypass Secure Boot. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4276 | 1 Insyde | 1 Insydeh2o | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| UsbCoreDxe has a vulnerability which can be used to write arbitrary memory inside SMRAM and execute arbitrary code at SMM level. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4280 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| MacOS version of Poedit bundles a Python interpreter that inherits the Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) permissions granted by the user to the main application bundle. An attacker with local user access can invoke this interpreter with arbitrary commands or scripts, leveraging the application's previously granted TCC permissions to access user's files in privacy-protected folders without triggering user prompts. Accessing other resources beyond previously granted TCC permissions will prompt the user for approval in the name of Poedit, potentially disguising attacker's malicious intent. This issue has been fixed in 3.6.3 version of Poedit. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4281 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Shenzhen Sixun Software Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System 7. This affects an unknown part of the file /api/GylOperator/LoadData. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4287 | 1 Pytorch | 1 Pytorch | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in PyTorch 2.6.0+cu124. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function torch.cuda.nccl.reduce of the file torch/cuda/nccl.py. The manipulation leads to denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 5827d2061dcb4acd05ac5f8e65d8693a481ba0f5. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42872 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver Enterprise Portal | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| Due to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, an unauthenticated attacker could inject malicious scripts that execute in the context of other users� browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, tokens, and other sensitive information. As a result, the vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality and integrity and no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42873 | 2 Sap, Sap Se | 2 Sapui5, Sapui5 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| SAPUI5 (and OpenUI5) packages use outdated 3rd party libraries with known security vulnerabilities. When markdown-it encounters special malformed input, it fails to terminate properly, resulting in an infinite loop. This Denial of Service via infinite loop causes high CPU usage and system unresponsiveness due to a blocked processing thread. This vulnerability has no impact on confidentiality or integrity but has a high impact on system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42951 | 1 Sap | 1 Business One | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Due to broken authorization, SAP Business One (SLD) allows an authenticated attacker to gain administrator privileges of a database by invoking the corresponding API.�As a result , it has a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42874 | 1 Sap | 2 Netweaver, Sap Netweaver | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High |
| SAP NetWeaver remote service for Xcelsius allows an attacker with network access and high privileges to execute arbitrary code on the affected system due to insufficient input validation and improper handling of remote method calls. Exploitation does not require user interaction and could lead to service disruption or unauthorized system control. This has high impact on integrity and availability, with no impact on confidentiality. | ||||