Export limit exceeded: 92759 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (92759 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-15554 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Els, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-08-12 | 7.4 High |
| the Undertow AJP listener honours forged ssl_cert and is_ssl AJP attributes without requiring any shared-secret authentication. This enables an unauthenticated attacker with direct TCP access to port 8009 to bypass CLIENT-CERT authentication by injecting a forged X.509 certificate via the AJP protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64108 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix busy dentry used after unmounting Since commit 340cea84f691c ("cifs: open files should not hold ref on superblock"), cifs file only holds the dentry ref_cnt, the cifs file close work(cfile->deferred) could be executed after unmounting, which will trigger a warning in generic_shutdown_super: BUG: Dentry 00000000a14a6845{i=c,n=file} still in use (1) [unmount of cifs cifs] The detailed processs is: process A process B kworker fd = open(PATH) vfs_open file->__f_path = *path // dentry->d_lockref.count = 1 cifs_open cifs_new_fileinfo cfile->dentry = dget(dentry) // dentry->d_lockref.count = 2 close(fd) __fput cifs_close queue_delayed_work(deferredclose_wq, cfile->deferred) dput(dentry) // dentry->d_lockref.count = 1 smb2_deferred_work_close _cifsFileInfo_put list_del(&cifs_file->flist) umount cleanup_mnt deactivate_super cifs_kill_sb cifs_close_all_deferred_files_sb cifs_close_all_deferred_files // cannot find cfile, skip _cifsFileInfo_put kill_anon_super generic_shutdown_super shrink_dcache_for_umount umount_check WARN ! // dentry->d_lockref.count = 1 cifsFileInfo_put_final dput(cifs_file->dentry) // dentry->d_lockref.count = 0 Fix it by flushing 'deferredclose_wq' before calling kill_anon_super. Fetch a reproducer in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221548. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64293 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr): if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) && sizeof(hdr) + cur->data_len > count - done) { hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr) evaluates to the size of the pointer. Surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr) consistently: if (done >= count || sizeof(*hdr) > count - done) { ... if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) { ... done += sizeof(*hdr); struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields, flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended. On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by 4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur->data_len to exceed count - done while 4 + cur->data_len does not will pass the check, then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer. It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer width. Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual amount that will be copied. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20349 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-12 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service for Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to insufficient error checking when processing HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the Remote Access SSL VPN service on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65673 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Microsoft Entra Connect | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Microsoft Entra Connect Sync allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64296 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: bound uniname advance in exfat_find_dir_entry() In exfat_find_dir_entry(), each TYPE_EXTEND (file name) entry advances the output pointer by a fixed amount while the loop guard only tracks the accumulated name length: if (++order == 2) uniname = p_uniname->name; else uniname += EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN; len = exfat_extract_uni_name(ep, entry_uniname); name_len += len; unichar = *(uniname+len); *(uniname+len) = 0x0; uniname grows by EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN (15) per name entry, but name_len grows only by the actual extracted length, which is shorter when a name fragment contains an early NUL. The only guard is `name_len >= MAX_NAME_LENGTH`, so a crafted directory with many short name fragments lets uniname run far past the p_uniname->name[MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 3] buffer while name_len stays small, causing an out-of-bounds read and write at *(uniname+len). The sibling extractor exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry() already stops on a short fragment (the lockstep `len != EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN` guard added in commit d42334578eba ("exfat: check if filename entries exceeds max filename length")); exfat_find_dir_entry() never got the equivalent. Track the per-entry write offset as a count and reject a fragment once the offset, or the offset plus the extracted length, would exceed MAX_NAME_LENGTH, before forming the output pointer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64298 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-12 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSv4: include MAY_WRITE in open permission mask for O_TRUNC POSIX requires write permission to truncate a file, so an open() that specifies O_TRUNC must be authorized for write access regardless of the O_ACCMODE access mode. nfs_open_permission_mask() builds the access mask passed to nfs_may_open(), which is the local authorization gate for OPENs the client serves itself from a cached write delegation via the can_open_delegated() path in nfs4_try_open_cached(). The mask is derived from O_ACCMODE alone, so an open(O_RDONLY | O_TRUNC) against a file the caller cannot write requests only MAY_READ and passes the local check. The OPEN is then satisfied locally and the truncation is issued to the server as a SETATTR(size=0) over the delegation stateid, which the server accepts under standard write-delegation semantics. POSIX requires that this open fail with EACCES. Include MAY_WRITE in the mask whenever O_TRUNC is set so the local check matches the access the server would have enforced. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66149 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Email Security | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') Vulnerability in the SonicWall Email Security appliance allows an authenticated attacker with access to the SonicWall Email Security restricted CLI can inject arbitrary OS commands that execute as root via netmask. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66150 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Email Security | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') Vulnerability in the SonicWall Email Security appliance allows an authenticated attacker with access to the SonicWall Email Security restricted CLI can inject arbitrary OS commands that execute as root via SNMP. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70340 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Cyclecloud | 2026-08-12 | 8.1 High |
| Missing authorization in Azure CycleCloud allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69320 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69278 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Incorrect authorization in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68792 | 1 Microsoft | 4 365 Apps, Office 2019, Office 2021 and 1 more | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Office allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65815 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Dynamics 365 | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65814 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 11 more | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage Port Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65789 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2026-08-12 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Windows DNS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65788 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 2 more | 2026-08-12 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65768 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Teams | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') in Microsoft Teams for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65664 | 1 Microsoft | 14 365 Apps, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise, Microsoft Office 2019 and 11 more | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65661 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Office 2016, Office 2019 and 2 more | 2026-08-12 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||